Toy Story 5

We interrupt our holiday snaps to give a short review of a new film. We rarely do reviews, but felt motivated for once.

Cast your mind back to 1995. The company Pixar had 3D rendering software to sell. John Lasseter had created a number of well-received shorts using the software, including Tin Toy, but they needed a full length film with a complicated story and characters. Thus was Toy Story born.

There was so much right about TS. It appealed to adults and children, it was serious and funny, and it was technologically wonderful.

It also set a predictable pattern for following films: bit of story in the first half then long chase. All the TS films, Up!, the Incredibles films and more do this.

TS was highly praised irrespective of the tech and it made a lot of money. Thus came TS2.

As ever, when you run out of ideas, add new characters to disguise the fact. So we get Jessie and the horse. Many people cite the Jessie song as a highlight.

So, in a money grabbing exercise, TS3 came. If TS2 was worse than the original, then TS3 was even worser. but it made money and brought the franchise to a close. They all lived happily ever after. This was 2010.

Sings again…

There is a category of film called “biopic”. To hear people talk about them, it’s annoying to hear “bi opic”. There’s nothing two about it, and goodness knows what “opic” is supposed to be. No, it’s “bio” as in biography and “pic” as in picture.

We generally hate bio-pics. They start with “Based on true events” which usually means it’s made up. Take the recentish film about Laurel and Hardy. True? Well, no, they did come to the UK for live shows, their shows were never unattended, they were very popular (that’s why they came back), there was never any friction between L & H over Hardy’s solo ventures. As there were contract negotiations for Laurel, he had actually encouraged Hardy to do other work. Hardy was a big gambler and needed the money.